Хураангуй:
In recent years, environmental pollution has intensified worldwide, making the alignment
of economic growth with environmental sustainability one of the most critical challenges of
sustainable development. Although the traditional post-industrial economic model has
significantly enhanced productivity and economic growth, it has also led to the
overexploitation of natural resources and substantial greenhouse gas emissions, thereby
accelerating ecosystem degradation. Given the limited regenerative capacity of the
environment, green development that balances economic growth with ecological
sustainability has become a global priority.
Within this context, China has proposed its “Dual Carbon” strategic goals, aiming to
substantially reduce carbon emissions by 2030. As part of this initiative, industries
characterized by high levels of pollution particularly in manufacturing, energy, and
resource-intensive sectors are required to prioritize green transition policies. At the firm level,
this necessitates a shift toward corporate green governance systems that integrate
environmental management with sustainable development objectives. However, the
implementation of green governance involves significant costs, including technological
innovation, installation of pollution-control equipment, and the adoption of new management
practices. These investments may negatively affect short-term profitability and financial
performance, leading many firms to underestimate the long-term benefits of green governance
and delay the transition.
Against this backdrop, the present study empirically examines the impact of corporate
green governance on financial performance using panel data from 675 large and
medium-sized A-share listed firms in high-pollution industries in China over the period
2014–2024. Panel regression models and long-term effect analyses are employed to identify
both the short- and long-term financial impacts of green governance. In addition, the study
investigates the mediating roles of corporate reputation, green innovation, and financing
constraints, as well as the moderating effects of government support and subsidies on this
relationship.
The findings reveal that corporate green governance exerts a time-varying, two-stage
effect on financial performance. In the initial years following implementation, firms
experience increased operating costs and reduced profitability, resulting in a negative impact
on financial performance. However, over time, as firms strengthen their environmental
responsibility, enhance their market reputation, gain greater trust from consumers and
investors, improve access to financing, and benefit from government incentives and policy
support, green governance significantly improves financial performance.
These results demonstrate that green governance is not merely a compliance mechanism
to meet regulatory requirements, but rather a strategic investment that enhances firms’
long-term financial sustainability and competitiveness. By providing large-scale, data-driven
empirical evidence on the dynamic financial effects of green governance in high-pollution
XIV
industries, this study makes important theoretical and practical contributions. The findings
offer valuable implications for policymakers seeking to refine incentive mechanisms for green
transition, for firms aiming to plan green investments in a phased and strategic manner, and
for investors evaluating ESG-based decisions more effectively.